Background Image
Previous Page  5 / 38 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 38 Next Page
Page Background

which led to an increasing number of cities,

residential areas, roads, power generation

plants, and the infrastructure in general.

As a result of the current energy subsidy

mechanism,

high-income

individuals

benefited from the system more than those

with limited-income. An IMF study said

that high-income categories, which are less

populated, claim more than 40% of the oil

products subsidies. Also, energy subsidy

policies helped highly energy-consuming

industries to grow more than small and

medium size industries, which resulted in a

decline in energy efficiency and an increase in

public budget burdens for member countries.

On another note, low fuel prices

contributed to a drop in the revenues of the

petroleum and electricity sectors’ investment,

which hugely caused investment in new and

renewable energy sectors to drop, and fuel

smuggling from countries that subsidize fuel

to their neighbors to rise.

In light of the big developments in the

world economy and the global oil market

due to the drop of oil prices, which led to

the creation of great economic challenges

for oil and gas exporting countries, including

OAPEC members, most OAPEC member

countries announced comprehensive revision

of their energy subsidies policies to control

domestic energy consumption, ensure that

their energy subsidies policies do not deviate

from their planned goals, and handle the

increasing burdens on public budgets.

Recently, we noticed the huge interest of

global media and social media in reforming

energy subsidies policies in OAPEC member

countries. Various views, whether against or

in favor of these policies, emerged.

OAPEC, while closely observing

developments in the Arab and international

petroleum industry, appreciates the member

countries’ efforts in this regard. OAPEC

sees that continuing with the current energy

subsidy programmes in a general way would

not help limited-income categories targeted

by these programmes, and might hinder

opportunities for an overall sustainable

economic growth on one hand, and reaching

an ideal use of economic resources on the

other hand.

For their subsidies reforms to succeed,

OAPEC member countries need to carefully

plan and ensure that these reforms would

not affect limited-income categories. This

can happen by adopting clear strategies and

goals through which reform impacts can be

assessed to design the necessary measures to

reduce any negative impacts of these policies

while using surpluses resulting from these

reforms in building up new aspects of public

spending.